![Student Law Notes - Legal notes for University studies](https://www.studentlawnotes.com/sites/all/themes/siteTheme/img/LG_StudentLawNotes.png)
![](https://www.studentlawnotes.com/sites/all/themes/siteTheme/img/GR_ArrowRed.png)
Inconsistency of Laws
Key Cases (Click to Follow)
- Wenn v Attorney-General (Victoria)
- Wollongong University v Metwally
- R v Credit Tribunal: ex parte General Motors Acceptance Corporation, Australia
- Clyde Engineering Co v Cowburn
- Ansett Transport Industries (Operations) v Wardley
- Mabo v Queensland
- Colvin v Bradley Bros
- Ex parte McLean
- Viskauskas v Niland
- Union Steamship Co of Australia v King (1988) 166 CLR 1
![](https://www.studentlawnotes.com/sites/default/files/law-notes-case-studies-2-large_172.jpg)
- Title
Update Required
To play the media you will need to either update your browser to a recent version or update your Flash plugin.
This recording is subject to Copyright
Purchase ![](/sites/all/themes/siteTheme/img/GR_Preview.png)
Please purchase to get access to the full audio summary.