Back to Legal Ethics

Ziems v The Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales (1957) 97 CLR 279

This case involved the distinction between a professionals private and professional life and whether or not the conduct in their private life can result in finding them not to be a fit and proper person to remain on the roll.

 

Share this case by email

Share this case

simple PHP captcha Refresh

Like this case study

Like Student Law Notes

Ziems v The Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales (1957) 97 CLR 279
Purchase
This is the preview only.
Please purchase to get access to the full audio summary.