Back to Constitutional Law

Union Steamship Co of Australia v King (1988) 166 CLR 1

This case considered the issue of inconsistency between State and Commonwealth laws and whether or not a State law on workers compensation for seaman was inconsistent with a Commonwealth law on the same subject and whether or not the Commonwealth law covered the field on this issue.

Share this case by email

Share this case

simple PHP captcha Refresh

Like this case study

Like Student Law Notes

Union Steamship Co of Australia v King (1988) 166 CLR 1
Purchase
This is the preview only.
Please purchase to get access to the full audio summary.