Back to Insolvency

Udovenko v Mitchell (1997) 79 FCR 418

This case considered the issue of the discretion of the court to go behind a judgment debt and whether or not a claim made by a solicitor for an unpaid bill that he had rendered to his client was sufficient to allow the court to issue a sequestration order.

Share this case by email

Share this case

simple PHP captcha Refresh

Like this case study

Like Student Law Notes

Udovenko v Mitchell (1997) 79 FCR 418
Purchase
This is the preview only.
Please purchase to get access to the full audio summary.