Back to Evidence Law

Subramaniam v Public Prosecutor [1956] 1 WLR

This case considered the issue of hearsay and whether or not statements to an accused person, which were made by a person who was not called to give evidence at trial was hearsay and whether the judge was incorrect in refusing to allow the evidence to be adduced at trial.

Share this case study

Like this case study

Subramaniam v Public Prosecutor [1956] 1 WLR
Purchase
This is the preview only.
Please purchase to get access to the full audio summary.