Back to Criminal Law - Australia

Rogers (1996) 86 A Crim R 542

This case considered the issue of necessity and whether or not a man could successfully plead the defence of necessity when he attempted to escape from gaol because he feared for his life.

Share this case by email

Share this case

simple PHP captcha Refresh

Like this case study

Like Student Law Notes

Rogers (1996) 86 A Crim R 542
Purchase
This is the preview only.
Please purchase to get access to the full audio summary.