Back to Legal Ethics

Rees v Sinclair [1974] 1 NZLR 180

This case considered the issue of immunity of an advocate in New Zealand and essentially follows the reasoning in the English case of Rondel v Worlsey.

 

Share this case by email

Share this case

simple PHP captcha Refresh

Like this case study

Like Student Law Notes

Rees v Sinclair [1974] 1 NZLR 180
Purchase
This is the preview only.
Please purchase to get access to the full audio summary.