Back to Legal Ethics

R v Deriz (1999) 109 A Crim R 329

This case considered the issue of prosecutor’s duties and whether or not remarks made by a prosecutor in their opening address were unduly inflammatory.

Share this case by email

Share this case

simple PHP captcha Refresh

Like this case study

Like Student Law Notes

R v Deriz (1999) 109 A Crim R 329
Purchase
This is the preview only.
Please purchase to get access to the full audio summary.