Back to Legal Ethics

R v Birks (1990) 19 NSWLR 677

This case considered the issue of barristers ignorance and whether or not the barrister failed in their duty to their client by not cross examining appropriately during the trial which resulted in a guilty verdict.


Share this case by email

Share this case

simple PHP captcha Refresh

Like this case study

Like Student Law Notes

R v Birks (1990) 19 NSWLR 677
This is the preview only.
Please purchase to get access to the full audio summary.