Back to Evidence Law

Payless Superbarn v O'Gara (1990) 19 NSWLR 551

This case considered the issue of the rule in Browne v Dunn and whether or not a trial judge was wrong in rejecting evidence that was otherwise relevant and admissible after a breach of the rule in Browne v Dunn had occurred.

Share this case by email

Share this case

simple PHP captcha Refresh

Like this case study

Like Student Law Notes

Payless Superbarn v O'Gara (1990) 19 NSWLR 551
Purchase
This is the preview only.
Please purchase to get access to the full audio summary.