Back to Equity & Trusts Law

Palette Shoes Pty Limited v Krohn (1937) 58 CLR 1

This case considered the issue of assignments of debts and whether or not an arrangement between a shoe retailer and manufacturer to sell shoes as agents amounted to an assignment of a debt and whether or not the direct proceeds from the sale of shoes was the retailers or the manufacturers.

Share this case by email

Share this case

simple PHP captcha Refresh

Like this case study

Like Student Law Notes

Palette Shoes Pty Limited v Krohn (1937) 58 CLR 1
Purchase
This is the preview only.
Please purchase to get access to the full audio summary.