Back to Torts Law - Australia

Nelson v Nelson [1923] St R Qd 37

This case considered the issue of detinue and whether or not the failure to respond to a demand for the return of goods amounted to a refusal sufficient to give rise to a cause of action in detinue.

Share this case by email

Share this case

simple PHP captcha Refresh

Like this case study

Like Student Law Notes

Nelson v Nelson [1923] St R Qd 37
This is the preview only.
Please purchase to get access to the full audio summary.