Back to Real Property Law

James v R-G (1967) 69 SR (NSW) 361

This case considered the issue of omitted easements and whether or not a correction to a title to include an easement that had been accidentally omitted by the registrar General was valid.

Share this case study

Like this case study

James v R-G (1967) 69 SR (NSW) 361
This is the preview only.
Please purchase to get access to the full audio summary.