Back to Legal Ethics

Hatty v Pilkinton (No 2) (1992) 35 FCR 433

This case considered the issue of misleading the court and whether or not a solicitor who did not inform the court that his client had been charged under a false name perverted the course of justice.

Share this case by email

Share this case

simple PHP captcha Refresh

Like this case study

Like Student Law Notes

Hatty v Pilkinton (No 2) (1992) 35 FCR 433
This is the preview only.
Please purchase to get access to the full audio summary.