Back to Evidence Law

Bunning v Cross [1978] HCA 22, 141 CLR 54

This case considered the issue of the courts discretion to exclude illegally obtained evidence and whether or not evidence of a breath test that had been carried out unlawfully could be admitted as evidence.

Share this case by email

Share this case

simple PHP captcha Refresh

Like this case study

Like Student Law Notes

Bunning v Cross [1978] HCA 22, 141 CLR 54
Purchase
This is the preview only.
Please purchase to get access to the full audio summary.