Back to Legal Ethics

Zanatta v McLeary [1976] 1 NSWLR 230

This case considered the issue of the admissibility of evidence relating to a judges reasoning and whether or not statements made by a judge out of court were admissible.

Share this case by email

Share this case

simple PHP captcha Refresh

Like this case study

Like Student Law Notes

Zanatta v McLeary [1976] 1 NSWLR 230
Purchase
This is the preview only.
Please purchase to get access to the full audio summary.